Surprise! There’s more water on Jupiter than anyone thought

Jupiter appears to have more water than anyone expected.

In addition to puzzling science measurements, Juno is taking stunning photos in its tour of Jupiter.

In addition to puzzling science measurements, Juno is taking stunning photos in its tour of Jupiter. (Image: © NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSS/Kevin M. Gill)

Newly released data from NASA’s Juno probe shows that water may make up about 0.25% of the molecules in the atmosphere over Jupiter’s equator. While that doesn’t sound like much, the calculation is based on a prevalence of water’s components, hydrogen and oxygen, three times more than at the sun. The new measurements Juno obtained are much higher than a previous mission suggested.

The surprise result has scientists delving deep again into results from NASA’s Galileo mission to Jupiter, which obtained drier results in 1995 when engineers deliberately threw the spacecraft into Jupiter’s atmosphere. (Galileo was low on fuel and NASA didn’t want to take the chance, even if it was a slight one, of the spacecraft accidentally crashing on a potentially habitable icy moon.)

Hot Jupiters, exoplanets around the same size as Jupiter that orbit very closely to their stars, often have cloud or haze layers in their atmospheres. This may prevent space telescopes from detecting atmospheric water that lies beneath the clouds, according to a study in the Astrophysical Journal. As much as half of the water in the atmospheres of these exoplanets may be blocked by these clouds or hazes, the research suggests. The study, led by researchers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, examined hot Jupiters that had been observed with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. Link: NASA Press release

Related: NASA’s Juno mission checks out epic Io eclipse on Jupiter

Reconciling the results from Galileo and Juno is key for scientists to better understand how our solar system came together, NASA said in a statement. Since Jupiter was probably the first planet to form, it could have sucked up most of the gas and dust that the sun’s formation left behind. How much water Jupiter soaked up, then, should help scientists identify the most plausible theories to explain its formation.

And understanding Jupiter’s birth would in turn help scientists understand how the planet’s wind currents move and what its insides are made of. Scientists should be able to generalize findings at Jupiter to certain kinds of large exoplanets to learn how other solar systems formed.

Galileo’s results were a puzzle even back in the 1990s. The spacecraft sent back data showing 10 times less water than scientists predicted, and more weirdly, the amount of water appeared to increase the deeper Galileo went into Jupiter’s atmosphere, according to the NASA statement. Scientists had expected that by the time it stopped transmitting data, at a depth of about 75 miles (120 kilometers), the atmosphere around it should have been well-mixed with an unchanging composition. 

A ground-based infrared telescope was able to measure water concentrations at Jupiter at the same time as Galileo’s plunge and showed that Galileo may have accidentally hit a dry spot, meaning water is not well-mixed deep in Jupiter’s atmosphere. 

Juno’s first eight flybys also showed a lack of atmospheric mixing. The spacecraft’s radiometer obtained data even deeper than Galileo’s measurements, at 93 miles (150 km) down, and found more water at the equator than Galileo did. 

Scientists are now waiting to compare Juno’s equatorial measurements with observations at the north of the planet; Juno’s 53-day orbit is gradually moving northward to examine more of that hemisphere with each flyby. The spacecraft’s next science flyby will be on April 10.

“Just when we think we have things figured out, Jupiter reminds us how much we still have to learn,” Scott Bolton, Juno principal investigator at the Southwest Research Institute, said in the NASA statement. “Juno’s surprise discovery that the atmosphere was not well mixed even well below the cloud tops is a puzzle that we are still trying to figure out. No one would have guessed that water might be so variable across the planet.”

The new research is described in a paper published Feb. 10 in the journal Nature Astronomy.

Follow Elizabeth Howell on Twitter @howellspace. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: